аЯрЁБс>ўџ 68ўџџџ5џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅС{` №ПсbjbjюFюF 4(Œ,Œ,сџџџџџџЄD D D D X ф2€ € € € € € € € ­ЏЏЏЏЏЏ$h~Мг6€ € 66г€ € шDЈЈЈ6j€ € ­Ј6­ЈЈVy@=€ t 3ЋЗ*nЦD  dЙ ‘,ИфХx:Ž:=:=T€  ТЈR œю H€ € € гг’€ € € ф6666 $ џџџџ Teaching and Learning Project Minutes March 21, 2006 Present: Present: Kiran Kamath, Richard Livingston, Cindy McGrath, Gil Rodriguez, Humberto Sale, Myra Snell, Nancy Ybarra, Ed Bolds, Dave Hobbs, Kirsten Martin, Delores McNair, Pam Perfumo, Cherry Li-Bugg Approval of Agenda and Minutes of February 21, 2006 Approved. Announcements A PSLO workshop was offered by Myra and Nancy on February 27, 2006. It was attended by JJ Stewart, Jim Kolthoff, Pam Perfumo, Michael Norris, Cindy McGrath, Estelle Davi, and Joanna Perry-Folino. Feedback was very positive, although anticipated questions were raised, e.g. What is a program? How broad should the outcomes be? Are we expecting different levels of performance from students who are in a “program” for one or two semesters vs. four semesters? What is the relationship between the program SLOs, the institutional level SLOs, and the COOR SLOs? Another workshop will be offered in Fall 2007. Nancy made a presentation to the Classified Senate on March 3 to update them on the work of the TLP. Feedback was positive and supportive. (We noted that we should also make a presentation to Associated Students of агАЩДЋУН. Nancy will work with Heather Nichols, student senator, to schedule this presentation if requested.) Myra, Nancy, Delores and Richard have been attending District meetings to plan a presentation to the Board of Governors on the district’s plans for assessment. This will be the topic of a special study session of the Board on April 26. Although each of the three colleges has taken a different approach, our presentation will emphasize the assessment cycle, and examples from each college that illustrate what is done at each phase. Response to Ideas Presented at the Retreat DE Committee: The TLP draft of proposed charge and membership of the DE Committee was distributed and discussed briefly, but not formally approved as there was insufficient time for discussion. It will be on the agenda for the next DE meeting in April; it is anticipated that the committee will approve it as it is a fairly close description of what that committee already does, and is consistent with its existing mission and goals. GE Committee: The TLP draft of the proposed charge and membership of the GE Committee was approved. It was suggested that it be forwarded to Curriculum Committee, as GE is currently an advisory committee to Curriculum Committee, and this would significantly expand its current charge. The draft has been sent to Curriculum Committee and will be on its agenda in an upcoming meeting. Oc. Ed.: The TLP draft has not yet been discussed by the OcEd committee, but it will be on a future agenda for discussion. Library and Learning Support Services (LLSS): This group has not yet convened, but a meeting is planned before the next TLP meeting. Student Services- TLP draft has not yet been reviewed. Distance Education: We had a brief discussion about the two prong nature of assessment in distant education: Folding on-line sections into ongoing assessment efforts Assessing the effectiveness of distance education itself This group will be meeting again on May 2nd. Service Learning: Dave Hobbs thought Service Learning should be folded into efforts of the above committees rather than standing alone as a separate entity to be assessed. Perhaps it should be considered a two prong effort along the same lines as Distance Ed? Feedback to the Planning Committee on latest draft of program review Gil provided the latest draft of the Instructional Program Review and Planning document. We reviewed section III. on Student Learning Outcomes. The committee thought it looked good. Our only discussion was on where core indicators required of Occupational Education programs for VATEA funding fit in. Myra and Nancy thought core indicators would be included as indirect measures of student learning outcomes for an occupational program. This raises the question of whether or not indirect measures alone constitute a sufficient assessment of student learning outcomes in a program. Continuing the “institutional dialogue”on assessment Committee members responded to the draft Myra had distributed documenting the institutional dialogue on assessment. Everyone found it very helpful – and impressive! One suggestion was to add a column to the when, what, who, why- a “so what?” column that would capture the outcome or result of the activity. Another suggestion was to add a category for work done by department and/or programs. This would capture the work we have been doing on pilot projects. Planning for Fall 2006 pilots Myra reminded us that we need to go back to our timeline and discuss the status of pilot projects and what pilots we will be doing in Fall 06. This will be on the agenda for our last semester of the meeting on May 2. 5 9 : E F T U ™ ­ Џ   ? B Ќ ѓ є ЅІЇг”ђRU€IKS™Аmрстї№цо№зЭХзОБЄ Є œ œ ˜”‰……}…}u}njfb}jh>ЧhЄphЖ^Д h&qЕ5>*h&qЕh&qЕH*h&qЕhД?!hApˆ hРE5>*hРEh™1 h n›hЯФhPЌHhЫЃІhPЌhPЌHhЪЃІhPЌhPЌ hPЌhPЌhPЌh™1 >*hРEh™1 5>* hPЌh™1 hPЌh6~ф>*hРEh6~ф5>* hPЌh6~фhРEh6~ф5&56  9 : E F T U Д є ІЇвг…†€їїђээээээээххниииаиШШУgd&qЕ & FgdApˆ & FgdРEgdРE & Fgd6~ф & FgdPЌgd6~фgdД?!$a$gdД?!сў>?ЌхMNRS˜™стфхопрїђїђъттђђђъђђђђђђђккккккђ$a$gdЖ^Д & Fgd&qЕ & Fgd&qЕgd&qЕ & FgdApˆтŒуфнопрсљѕёѕъёуъме h™1 h n› hРEh&qЕ h%Uцh%Uц h%Uц5>*h%UцhЖ^Д hЖ^Д5>* рсњgd n›21h:pД?!Аа/ Ар=!А"Аь# $ %ААаАа а†œD@ёџD NormalCJ^J_HaJmH sH tH DA@ђџЁD Default Paragraph FontRi@ѓџГR  Table Normalі4ж l4жaі (k@єџС(No List^ўOЂё^\PЌInformation TechnologyCJOJQJ^JaJphџс(џџџџ569:EFTUДєІЇвг…† €    > ? Ќ х   M N R S ˜ ™ стфхопру˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€у @00ƒтсрссџџцо lсичоьKЮшо bйщоМƒйъо ЌKЮыоє+йьо ќъ!эоlKЮюо dk"яо Мъ!№о|ъ!ёо lƒ"ђо lWиѓоœЋиєо <ЄйѕоДђиіо L^аїоьЎйјо o#˜˜t}}ДДєњњЧааAAу     œœx‚‚ЙЙ••јџџЫееEEу V*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€place€http://www.5iantlavalamp.com/h*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€City0€http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags  еVћџMQko~‚  > B  рру:C hlЉ­К Ь ђіпу3333333&&55ІІ  Ћ Ћ R R э№ёџпрруррућb€R€+џџџџџџџџџв( ШЌО”џџџџџџџџџДkгMlm6Ђџџџџџџџџџh„8„˜ўЦ8^„8`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№h„„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHoh„и „˜ўЦи ^„и `„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№h„Ј „˜ўЦЈ ^„Ј `„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№h„x„˜ўЦx^„x`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHoh„H„˜ўЦH^„H`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№h„„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№h„ш„˜ўЦш^„ш`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHoh„И„˜ўЦИ^„И`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№„а„˜ўЦа^„а`„˜ўo(.€ „ „˜ўЦ ^„ `„˜ў‡hˆH.‚ „p„LџЦp^„p`„Lџ‡hˆH.€ „@ „˜ўЦ@ ^„@ `„˜ў‡hˆH.€ „„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ў‡hˆH.‚ „р„LџЦр^„р`„Lџ‡hˆH.€ „А„˜ўЦА^„А`„˜ў‡hˆH.€ „€„˜ўЦ€^„€`„˜ў‡hˆH.‚ „P„LџЦP^„P`„Lџ‡hˆH.„а„˜ўЦа^„а`„˜ўo(.€ „ „˜ўЦ ^„ `„˜ў‡hˆH.‚ „p„LџЦp^„p`„Lџ‡hˆH.€ „@ „˜ўЦ@ ^„@ `„˜ў‡hˆH.€ „„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ў‡hˆH.‚ „р„LџЦр^„р`„Lџ‡hˆH.€ „А„˜ўЦА^„А`„˜ў‡hˆH.€ „€„˜ўЦ€^„€`„˜ў‡hˆH.‚ „P„LџЦP^„P`„Lџ‡hˆH.ДkгMв( ћb€џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ                           х™1 РEД?!щcSКXWЄpApˆ n›PЌЖ^Д&qЕЯФ>Ч6~ф%Uц&у#ЃѕvM0џ@€рршррс@@џџUnknownInformation Technologyџџ(Information Technology20060303T150713445ЧЃІџџInformation TechnologyџџџџџџџџG‡z €џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡z €џArial?5 ‡z €џCourier New;€Wingdings"1ˆ№аhЧтЄІwЅFvб "б "!№ ДД4ии 2ƒq№HX №џ?фџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ6~ф2џџTeaching and Learning ProjectInformation TechnologyInformation Technology   ўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0Є˜РЬьј 4@ ` l x„Œ”œф Teaching and Learning ProjectInformation TechnologyNormalInformation Technology8Microsoft Office Word@D|@:d‹юjЦ@*1­*nЦбўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎ0 hpŒ”œЄ ЌДМФ Ь іфагАЩДЋУН" иG Teaching and Learning Project Title ўџџџ !"#$ўџџџ&'()*+,ўџџџ./01234ўџџџ§џџџ7ўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РF0яИЗ*nЦ9€1TableџџџџџџџџRWordDocumentџџџџџџџџ4(SummaryInformation(џџџџ%DocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџ-CompObjџџџџџџџџџџџџqџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вq