аЯрЁБс>ўџ -/ўџџџ,џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅСq` №ПlbjbjqPqP . ::lџџџџџџЄЄЄЄЄЄЄЄИ< < < < H И№2h h h h h h h h oqqqqqq$"hŠМ•Єд h h д д •ЄЄh h Њ   д šЄh Єh o д o  ћЄЄGh \  uЁд`ЇЩ< n .oР0№,Fœ jFGFЄG(h >І , в $і оh h h •• h h h №д д д д ИИИ„< ИИИ< ИИИЄЄЄЄЄЄџџџџ Teaching and Learning Project Minutes March 17, 2009 Present: Ken Alexander, Ruth Goodin, Cherry Li-Bugg, Gail Newman, Christina Goff, Richard Livingston, Pam Perfumo Len Price, Tue Rust, Debbie Wilson and Nancy Ybarra. Guest: Peter Garcia Minutes of February 17 were approved. Today’s agenda was approved with the addition of an update on the TLP Coordinator position by Peter. Announcements The Student Success Conference will be held October 7-9 at the San Francisco Airport Marriott. This is the main assessment conference for California. Richard has volunteered once again to be the point person for organizing an агАЩДЋУН team to attend. This is a good conference for new leaders in the assessment effort to attend. Update on TLP Coordination Peter joined us to announce that Kiran will take the lead on convening a task force to respond to the accreditation requirement that we submit a plan by October 2009 detailing how we plan to update all of our COORs to include CSLOs, and how we plan to assess them. This still leaves the question of who will be the TLP Coordinator. Despite the recommendation of the TLP and the Academic Senate that we create a full time tenure track position this year, the UF opposed it, stating that any new position in the district would need to be negotiated. Peter is open to exploring other options in the meanwhile. Ruth reported that we could apply for a new Title 5 coop grant, and SLO coordination could be part of that application, including a grant funded faculty coordinator. This of course would not be a tenure track position, but if the position was successful, we could continue to work on creating such a position. Pam wondered if could somehow draw in existing positions on campus such as Curriculum Chair and Academic Senate VP. Nancy emphasized the need to fill the position with someone who has expertise in assessment, and who would not rotate; she feels that because we have a number of faculty who have responsibility for assessment in their respective areas – GE, DE, etc.- we really need one person who provides continuity and a stable base of support for those faculty. Peter wondered if we might, in the short term, be able to contract with someone in another district who would essentially take a leave from their current place of employment and consult with us in this capacity. Richard will check out this option with our district office. Program Review Assessment Report Feedback Nancy distributed a sample feedback letter based on our review of the Engineering assessment report at our last meeting, as well as a general template for providing feedback and a draft cover letter. She also shared the latest version of the assessment planning grid that will appear in the Fall 2009 program review update. We practiced using the feedback template in small groups on assessment reports submitted for majors/transfer. Next steps: Using notes generated on the feedback forms, Nancy will type up feedback to the programs whose assessment reports we reviewed today. She will send these out for the committees review. This process will be repeated by the following committees: Developmental Ed, General Ed, Occupational Ed, Student Services, LL&S. Chairs of the committee will type a synthesized version of the feedback and forward it to the appropriate dean. The dean will send the completed feedback forms along with a cover letter and a preview of the assessment portion of the 2009 program review update to program leads as follows: Student Services: Gail Newman Library: Cherry Li-Bugg General Ed: Gil Rodriguez Developmental Ed: Gil Rodriguez Majors/Transfer: Gil Rodriguez Occupational Ed: Kiran Kamath œГДНО‚  з ђ § Уpqrœ™ .8RœЎё+ijklќѕќѕќѕќэќэќщхщхнхйхйхйхйхЮЦОЗА hv Kh6ѓ hv Khv Khv KmH sH h6ѓmH sH h6ѓh6ѓmH sH hv Kh6ѓh6ѓ>*h6ѓhqS}hЙРhЙР>* hЙРhЙРhЙР&56опѓє  €  ‚  ‘ ж з ђ ѓ § ў _`qrœїїїїђђђђђђђђђђђъђђђђђђђђђђђ & FgdЙРgdЙР$a$gdЙРl§PQ]^КЛйё +KijklњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњgdЙР,1hАа/ Ар=!А"А# $ %ААаАа а†œ@@ёџ@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@ђџЁD Default Paragraph FontRi@ѓџГR  Table Normalі4ж l4жaі (k@єџС(No Listl џџџџ&56опѓє€‚‘жзђѓ§ў_`q r œ  P Q ] ^   К Л й ё +Kijkn˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€l l lџџД$!Е$!~ўЖ$!4‡ўЗ$!ДŸ‹ ‹ n%%  n9*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€State€8*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€City€9*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€place€ ИЛшФЩекБ Е љ ћ   !*+1AJKWXZn†С Х :@n333пѓ‚‘зђr › Q ] у  +JKhnБ Е nX:RLfНd"џџџџџџџџџh„а„˜ўЦа^„а`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№h„ „˜ўЦ ^„ `„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHoh„p„˜ўЦp^„p`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№h„@ „˜ўЦ@ ^„@ `„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№h„„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHoh„р„˜ўЦр^„р`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№h„А„˜ўЦА^„А`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№h„€„˜ўЦ€^„€`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHoh„P„˜ўЦP^„P`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№X:RLџџџџџџџџ         хv KqS}ЙР6ѓџ@€Е Е ОшЕ Е lp@џџUnknownџџџџџџџџџџџџG‡z €џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡z €џArial?5 ‡z €џCourier New;€Wingdings"qˆ№аh&ŒгF_ŒгF-'E 'E !№ ДД24ee 2ƒQ№HX)№џ?фџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџЙР2џџTeaching and Learning ProjectInformation TechnologyInformation Technology ўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0Ј˜РЬьј 8D d p |ˆ˜ ф Teaching and Learning ProjectInformation Technology Normal.dotInformation Technology1Microsoft Office Word@NSI@