ࡱ> }|[ >bjbj 4~ΐΐ6  OOlC@4h@j@j@j@j@j@j@BEj@j@OO@pORh@h@2"$5U`nP@3T@@0@3EFTEF4$5EF$50 j@j@@EF  :  ACADEMIC SENATE MEETING SUMMARY 10/26/09 Room 222 3:00-5:00 p.m. Present: Christina Goff, Michael Norris, Ginny Richards, Clint Ryan, Bill Fracisco, Mark Lewis, Alex Sample, Brendan Brown, Robin Aliotti, Cindy McGrath, Scott Cabral, Cathy McCaughey, Mara Landers, Nancy Bachmann, Andy Ochoa, John Henry, Lydia Macy, Estelle Davi, Judy Bank, Janice Townsend Guest(s): Mitch Schweickert Topic/ActivitySummary/Actions Taken1Call to Order2Public Comment3Senate Announcements & ReportsAnnouncements DGC unanimously voted to forward the EEO Plan to the Chancellors Cabinet with the facultys concerns. General Education Committee The second and final GE Seminar was on October 19th. The faculty held small group discussions regarding Readers Knowledge and textbook concept relations. Shared Governance Council (SGC) Last meeting was October 14th. Adam Jacobs gave an update about TAG and IT. There was some discussion about the direction IT is moving in and the posting of Adams current job position. IT should have more open communication in a formal working environment. Three sub-committees gave reports. Health & Safety Committee: Bruce Cutler is developing an agenda and will forward it to SGC. Recent topics were the flu and safety on campus. Bruce is continuing to give updates on new topics campus-wide. Professional Development Committee: Ruth Goodin had put together some information on a workshop seminar that the Professional Development Committee had done, she is still working on committee direction. One suggestion was that Professional Development surrounded around main events and functions that needed to be done during the year such as COOR Assessment. TLP: Richard Livingston reported that its not just about compliance but SLOs feeds into a lot of different areas that he feels very strongly that TLP leadership needs to be settled. SGC was given another outline on the RAP proposals. SGC had their full day retreat on Friday and were divided into three groups. Some experts from different areas were invited. Each group reviewed some of the 3-5 different plans that the committees are working on.4,5Approval of previous minutes Agenda reading and approvalMinutes approved with comments: (16-0-0) Agenda item #8 AA Degree-removing requirement and student impact: Philosophy 41 as taught takes more of a scientific approach and does not cover ethical inquiry criteria. But the class still can transfer as a GE course but does not meet the Ӱɴý GE requirement. There still could be good reasons for making the change. Agenda approved with one correction: Laurie Huffman is not present to present item #7 so that item will be removed from the agenda for this meeting. (16-0-0)6AppointmentsTechnology Advisory Group (TAG) Representative Clint Ryan and Curtis Corlew wish to continue as TAG representatives. Tue Rust has stepped down as a rep. Motion moved, seconded and passed to approve Clint Ryan and Curtis Corlew as TAG representatives. (16-0-0) District EEOAC Representative The District Equal Employment Opportunity Advisory Committee needs a Ӱɴý faculty representative. Motion moved, seconded and passed to approve Michael Yeong as the Ӱɴý Faculty Representative for the District EEOAC. (16-0-0) Web Media Committee The Web Media Committee is a Ӱɴý webpage feedback committee to marketing. Kim Wentworth and Nick Garcia would like to be representatives on this committee. Motion moved, seconded and passed to approve Kim Wentworth and Nick Garcia as representatives for the Web Media Committee. (16-0-0) Exemplary Program Award (Handout) The Exemplary Program Awards theme this year is for creating a bridge program that connects students from Developmental Education courses to move into Transfer Level courses. There were originally two Ӱɴý programs that expressed interest, AVID and Umoja. AVID did not put in an application. Umoja submitted a proposal. Concern: timeliness of the presentations to the Academic Senate for nomination selection. Several senators felt that they would like to see any proposals prior to the senate meeting in order to confer with their constituents. Suggestion: that if the presentation is not turned in on time then the Senate should not consider the nominations. Suggestion: in the future nominees should make a presentation at the senate meeting and complete a short application to the Senate for their consideration. Then the selected nominee(s) would complete the final state application packet. Suggestion: develop a clear procedure or process including timelines for award nominations. The Academic Senate decides not to nominate any program for the Exemplary Program Award this year due to the timeliness of nominee presentations and materials.8Curriculum Committee: Content Review Janice TownsendHistory and Discussion Curriculum Committee (CC) needs 1-2 faculty members for Content Review. Prospective members of Content Review should be experienced authors of COORs and understand COORs and SLOs. Content Review meets every Tuesday from 4:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Content Review members are responsible for completing a detailed editing review of COORs, ensuring that it is technically sound and that the assessments are attached to the CSLOs and aligned with program and/or institutional level SLOs. The primary question is can the Curriculum Committee select members for Content Review who are not currently on the Curriculum Committee. Janice conveyed that the Curriculum Committee voted that the Academic Senate should authorize whether or not Content Review members must also be on the Curriculum Committee. One problem is that not enough Curriculum Committee members are willing to serve on Content Review also. Suggestions Suggestion: if it is decided that members of Content Review do not need to be on Curriculum Committee as well, then those individuals should go through a rigorous training on COORs and Content Review. Suggestion: prospective Content Review members could also consider joining the Curriculum Committee in the future. Janice stated that most of the faculty who want to be on the Content Review are part-time and there has never been part-time faculty on Curriculum Committee. Question: could adjunct faculty be non-voting members of the Curriculum Committee? There are no funds to pay for extra time spent on Content Review or Curriculum Committee for adjunct faculty. Suggestion: if there are any hot topics or controversial issues that arise in Curriculum Committee, these issues should be included in the Curriculum Committee Report to the Academic Senate. Janice will work on proposed members who would like to be on Content Review. This discussion will be continued at the next Academic Senate.9DVC Environmental Science Program Mitch SchweickertInformation At the last Academic Senate meeting, the Senate requested to hear from the Ӱɴý Environmental Science Program Department to assure that DVCs Environmental Science Program would not negatively impact our program enrollment Mitch stated that the majority of the students that are taking the new Environmental Science courses are taking them to fulfill GE requirements not because it is their major. He also stated that DVC has many Earth Science and Geology courses already and that now they are merely consolidating existing courses to create an Environmental Science Program. It is the opinion of the Ӱɴý Environmental Science Program that if DVC were to implement this program as well it would not interfere with enrollment in Ӱɴýs Environmental Science Program. A motion was moved, seconded and approved for Ӱɴý Academic Senate to support the approval of the DVC Environmental Science Program. (15-0-0)10EvaluationsDiscussion and Comments The process for which the UF has gone through to review, edit and make changes to the Evaluation Guidebooks and Procedures is as follows: 1.) Brainstorming- What changes can be made, etc. 2.) Surveys- Requesting ideas from faculty, UF, etc. 3.) Group Breakouts- 3 levels 4.) Pasta Feed- representatives from UF, Faculty, Senate etc. to evaluate the results from the group breakouts. 5.) FSCC & Senates- Approval of process Jeff Michels from the UF is requesting of vote of confidence in the re-writing process of evaluations. Union members will have the opportunity to vote on the documents/guidebooks in the end. If there is something that is entirely incorrect and/or that needs to be changed you may let Jeff Michels know. The Non-Instructional Faculty (i.e. Library, DSPS) feel they did not get the same consideration as instructional faculty in the process or in the feedback of their Evaluation Guidebooks. The Evaluation Guidebook for the DSPS Learning Disability Specialist is not completed yet. Motion is moved, seconded and passed to approve a vote of confidence in the UF re-writing process of Evaluation Guidebooks, with the exception that all faculty groups, particularly Library, Counseling and DSPS faculty should have had the same level of consultation and had earlier participation in the process. Also the UF needs to immediately complete and distribute the DSPS Evaluation Guidebooks. (13-0-2) Abstentions: Robin Aliotti and Judy Bank11TLP Leadership & Location amongst college governance History At SGC a question regarding TLPs fit in regards to amongst college governance. TLP was created by the Academic Senate it does have a majority of faculty on it but is not exclusively faculty. There were a few suggestions in SGC: come under purview of the Senate or to be under Curriculum Committee. TLP is in charge of teaching and learning on the Ӱɴý campus and in our community. It is also in charge of looking at the institutional, program and course levels of student learning outcomes which is part of compliance and part of improving student learning. They also do work in program review relating to the collection and review of assessment plans and feedback to the departments. Discussion & Suggestions Suggestion: that it be under the purview of SGC. Suggestion: that it be like an equivalent to Curriculum Committee and report directly to the Academic Senate. The TLP does contain managers who do have a voting voice on the committee which is different than Curriculum Committee and the Senate would run into problems with that issue. A statement was made that when TLP was derived it had a dual reporting relationship to SGC and the Academic Senate due to the Student Services component in the group. If Management does not agree with continuing the dual reporting relationship, 4/5 of TLP is of academic, and Management should be okay with TLP reporting to the Academic Senate. Tawny Beal has temporarily taken the charge of coordinating all three levels of assessment in TLP because, no faculty would step forward to take the charge and the CSLOs and assessments need to be done to comply with accreditation. TLP to report to Curriculum Committee will not work. Michael Norris stated that he would take to Peter Garcia the feedback and suggestions regarding TLP reporting to the Senate because it is primarily academic and professional matters. Also the legal issue that Managers cannot report to the Academic Senate yet, there are Managers on TLP. Michael will bring back to the Senate the suggestions/feedback from Peter Garcia.12Plenary Session Feedback (Handout)Review of Handout Review of resolutions to be decided on at the Fall Plenary Session on November 14th. There are two main resolutions that need to be reviewed by the Senate before a vote at the Plenary Session. The rest of the resolutions are located at the website  HYPERLINK "http://www.asccc.org" www.asccc.org then click on resolutions, if you would like to review them. There is some discussion about the Resolution 4.02 Response to AB 440: Transfer Degree. Michael stated that this resolution will be put on a future agenda for discussion. 6.02 Revise the Application of the 50% Law What the 50% Law means is that 50% of the districts current expense of education must be expended each fiscal year for payment of salaries of classroom instructors, which does not include non-instructional faculty (i.e. librarians, counselors, etc.) district-wide. The suggested changes to the 50% Law are: 1.) Abolish the 50% law 2.) Rewrite to include non-instructional faculty as part of the 50% but increase it to 54% 3.) Exclude non-instructional faculty so they are a completely separate category. This suggestion would make it hard to hire non-instructional faculty in Box 2A as they would not count as part of the 50%. 18.01 Early Assessment Program (EAP) Funding and Implementation The EAP is a test that is given out by CSUs that decides whether or not the student is ready for college-level work. The resolution is trying to get it so this is one of the tests that will be given out in 2009-2010 year. One of the issues is that there may not be funding for it. Another issue is it doesnt break things down into Math 4, Math 25, Math 30 etc. or English 70, English 90, etc., the test just merely indicates yes or no. Part of the resolution is asking that it be worked out as a placement tool for the community colleges as well. Conclusion Michael stated that if you have time to read through the resolutions by Friday please e-mail any comments or suggestions to him before then. Michael will e-mail a report from the resolution review meeting on Friday then you may e-mail Michael back any suggestions or comments to take to the Plenary Session in November.13Student Grade Appeal ProcessDiscussion W was inadvertently included in grades to appeal. This does need to be fixed. The question is if there anyone in the Senate that wants the W to be a grade that can be appealed. The consensus of the Senate is that the W should not be an appealable grade.14Adjournment "'*4DN^n ( 4 @ N h i j û{skk[T hP'.hOhP'.h<5CJOJQJaJh^OJQJh7 OJQJhg@OJQJhr6aOJQJhtOJQJh4OJQJhGsOJQJhkOJQJhXi OJQJh,POJQJh\(OJQJhfoOJQJhh?OJQJh<OJQJhfo5OJQJhXi 5OJQJh<5OJQJh}!5OJQJ"DENi j $Ifgd<gd< $@&a$gd< qhhh $Ifgd<kd$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{     " i j ! @ A \ ^ l { ŽŽŲ}og[ggSh"OJQJhihiH*OJQJhiOJQJh8?h6F)5>*OJQJhihiOJQJh10Oh10OH*OJQJh10OOJQJhg@5>*OJQJhXi 5>*OJQJhw@hw@OJQJh4OJQJhw@OJQJhw@5>*OJQJhh?OJQJhP'.h?OJQJ hP'.hOhP'.h<OJQJ qhh[ $If^gdt $Ifgd<kd$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{  j qhh[J[ & F$If]gdm $If]gdt $Ifgd<kdR$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{ ! A C f 3 T] & F$If]gdm & F$If]gdm $If]gd8? & F$If]gdm B C f 3 V ] d 0?JR&>\]^ƾϾϾϾϾ϶϶϶϶ϫh5OJQJht5OJQJhP'.he^OJQJ hP'.hOhm<hm<OJQJhjOJQJh X,OJQJhm<>*ϴm<OJQJh4OJQJhC>*OJQJh 4OJQJh"OJQJhCOJQJ4]^bofff]]T $Ifgd $IfgdHr $Ifgd kd$$IfllF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{%&(1¹~sk`UJUJUhw@5>*OJQJh[C5>*OJQJhP'.h]OJQJhtOJQJhP'.he^OJQJh2'OJQJ hP'.hOh]h]OJQJh OJQJhw@OJQJh 'OJQJhj5OJQJhw@5OJQJhh[OJQJh>*OJQJhOJQJhHrOJQJhOJQJh]OJQJh]5OJQJqhh_RIRI $Ifgd & F$Ifgdm $IfgdF $Ifgd<kd$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{M7e  #'0.6ƻƻxmmmםםeeםeh?tOJQJh 5>*OJQJhu[OJQJhu[hu[OJQJhu[5OJQJh$;=5OJQJh$;=OJQJh[C5>*OJQJh%5>*OJQJhw@hw@OJQJhw@OJQJhw@5OJQJh X,OJQJhF5>*OJQJh6h'5>*OJQJhw@5>*OJQJ' LAkdQ$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{ & F$Ifgd X, $Ifgd h$If^hgdu[ & F$Ifgdm6JLV1:;0=C,6>ž10ϴv5>*ϴ.>5>*ϴ'.%ϴ<OJQJhP'.he^OJQJh%OJQJ hP'.hOh6h'hvKOJQJh6h'OJQJh&@OJQJh?tOJQJhvKOJQJh$;=OJQJh X,OJQJ.Zf0!!Q"  & F$Ifgd5  & F$Ifgdm  & F$Ifgdm $If^gdi9&  & F$Ifgdm $If^gd% $Ifgd $Ifgd< #9<S_~   $PU~&]q%9<BSYZfs/0IXͺͺ¯ড়hsOJQJh"h"OJQJh"OJQJhi9&5>*OJQJh 'OJQJhi9&hi9&OJQJhi9&h^cOJQJhvKOJQJh <OJQJh^cOJQJh10OOJQJhi9&OJQJ:A !!!!!h!!!!!"7"P"Q"R"S"T"u"v""""""#D#I#T#q#r#~$$$$$$$$ƾxh.>OJQJh$cOJQJh&@OJQJh SOJQJhLg5>*OJQJh.>5>*OJQJhOJQJh OJQJh%OJQJ hP'.hOhi9&h"OJQJh5OJQJh"OJQJhi9&OJQJhsOJQJh <OJQJ/Q"R"T"v"""r#$%qhhh[NNN  & F$Ifgdm $If^gd% $Ifgd<kd$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{$$%%&& &!&#&$&/&0&:&G&H&&&&''8'L'V'e'''''3(>(E(T(((()))Q)))ļ{{{{{{s{s{s{s{{k{hhOJQJh}@OJQJh>AOJQJh.>OJQJhD5>*OJQJh>A5>*OJQJh.>5>*OJQJh~OJQJh OJQJhOJQJh%OJQJ hP'.hOh$ch&@OJQJh$c5OJQJh&@5OJQJh$cOJQJh&@OJQJ(% &!&$&0&H&&d[[NA  & F$Ifgdm $If^gd% $Ifgd<kd$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{ $If^gd&@&'9'W'''))4*++ $If^gd}@ $If^gdL?<  & F$IfgdL?<  & F$Ifgd$c h$If^hgd$c ))))))3*4******+=+D+N++++++++++++ ,0,1,2,:,;,B,],,,-!-B-E-g-ν貫ummmmhQOJQJh 5>*ϴ}5>*ϴ3ϴ<OJQJhtEnOJQJh%OJQJ hP'.hh.>.>ϴSϴ5OϴS5Oϴ?<5OJQJh.>ϴ}ϴ>ϴ?<OJQJ*+++1,2,;,g-.qhhh[NN  & F$Ifgdm $If^gd% $Ifgd<kdL$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{g-...////6/7/@/A////R0S0Z1a111v2222294:4;4=4>4V4`4a4r4s44444l5m55źգyՅmjhwOJQJUhwhwH*OJQJhwOJQJh5>*OJQJh,s5>*OJQJhOJQJh%OJQJ hP'.htEnh,shOJQJhOJQJh OJQJh,sOJQJh}@OJQJh}@5>*OJQJhQOJQJh YiOJQJ*./6/S0122:4;4Jkd$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{  & F$Ifgd  & F$Ifgdm $If^gd}@;4>4a4s44566778[8)9i9G:;;; $Ifgdm" & F $Ifgdc $Ifgdc h$If^hgd & F$Ifgd $Ifgdw & F$Ifgdm $Ifgd' $Ifgd<5555555366688888'9(9)9i9;;<<<<=== ======>λλλް֚umaXaXahQ5OJQJh\rhm"5OJQJhQOJQJh%5>*OJQJh,s5>*OJQJh%OJQJ hP'.hhm"hm"OJQJhm"5>*ϴc5>*ϴcϴ5>*ϴϴ"ϴwϴ󱹲w0ϴwϴ";<<<<=>d[[RE & F$IfgdQ $Ifgd' $Ifgd<kd$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{ & F $Ifgdm">>>>>qhh_ $Ifgd' $Ifgd<kdG$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{>>>>>>>>hd\h h<h%OJQJ hP'.h%>>>>>>>qoooookd$$IflF`0*D  t0*6    44 layt{21h:pxz/ =!"#$% $$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V ll t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{$$If!vh55D 5#v#vD #v:V l t0*655D 5yt{^ 2 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH H`H <Normal CJOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH DA`D Default Paragraph FontRi@R 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List jj < Table Grid7:V0VYV H; Document MapM CJOJQJ^JaJHH /[ Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ@@"@ FW List Paragraph ^m$6U@16 NAQ Hyperlink >*B*phPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] 66~ 6$)g-5>> #')+-/0257:= ]Q"%&+.;4;>>>!"$%&(*,.134689;<>l---6XL# AA@0(  B S  ?6z l q  05|66 _i3:66333 Q!!#=#B$W$Z$]$`$`$o$o$$$$$%!%B%E%&&''''6'7'@'A'''l--555 5555555555566 ZJ B9-*YZWBzFUZ#_(ED76;8VIn%Fv Nhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`OJQJo(hHh8^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohx^x`OJQJo(hHhH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH ;8Y zFFv-InD7#_(                                                                                           m 1;* ma\JX$GUa+i N2S~3!^3 5 + / 0 8 t / Xi    0K : t  7 8 ] (03`p~$&9&cZmSBB"E.[e^_te!in+ {5!F6[CIp<VK^cGH:<JCok)<?+ 9 K BQ v!rk!}!;"G"["k"o"S##6$VF$m$% %%>% D% &i9&2'6h'l'\()?')6F)*U*V*e++9+1,A, X,`\,0(-5-<-.P'.B/t/ 0Ks1 2;2qu2u2MC3e3 444* 4}D45&575^5O6,j7{s7!8&8(8W8h9_9H;< <r<L?<;f<m<v<==$;=s=.>W>gv>#x>8?B?W?h?|@@@1@]\@g@w@}@?mAmAzAaBFbB+pBrB(C:[C-]CzCm-DWD[DjDE +EhJE2F8FmF rFefGoGHXH/WHLjI%~I1J2JTL\M(MbM10OWO,P>P&QNAQ R&R/(R~5RJLRORGkRS S3(S*T^1T]TnT3U`Un V$Vo=V%tV Wr&WFWSW&bWnW?XTYbY"!Z&Z;ZYPZwZ*[u[M5\d\v]^^^U]^q^@ _%_2_s_@`+ar6a?6b>bZTb$cyc$cAcEcMcQcV;dHdcdf%f(f^Gfdg`!hs!hLi YijH(jk~'kL6A2_zh/]]j{p7w~22S_d,sczHc)IlJOxzz# 'BNNDrm"=V68Y;Z38vKMRdmIz-Ps &.(W[}tL"Qt2`<dfl OR/>CHl5$D8q{AEbmv`/CabY,\G:USW^ mi}& : GWbVOz4>rO%V\":5X4,?&4w1R">Ky{2(tYl O"u&@~P/[1bQAe&i9_#KI5wc3^h Rv~ @<gF)ObJ1]y4\7^|{y> jq:pb&l{O*i23a>Fe'G8~ 5 "fz;? STVl9 H ".nJ^g2zbYb_#lE(4En%RfYCl?tJ >L' nGs:71;DGiNCH]O[l>AX %_MNz0 9(Sdc6zIVDpGHd|ImHrNN{\$&?IN .j^c\kIt^ (#:\Of!FK^+FPyYDUUfW/>?&,29l H$d?KMZ^zT't.:-ELg &@aHC{ 66@6@Unknown G* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * ArialCLucida BrightE. Century Gothic5. *aTahoma?= * Courier New;WingdingsA BCambria Math"qh_fOf .b.b!20552QHP  ?<2!xx ACADEMIC SENATE MEETING SUMMARY Information Technology Brobertson4         Oh+'0 ,8 X d p|$ACADEMIC SENATE MEETING SUMMARY Information TechnologyNormal Brobertson12Microsoft Office Word@|;@BVX@Xn.՜.+,D՜.+,\ hp  Ӱɴýb5 !ACADEMIC SENATE MEETING SUMMARY Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSAdBhttp://www.asccc.org/  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?ABCDEFGIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijkmnopqrsuvwxyz{~Root Entry FL_`nData @1TableHyFWordDocument 4~SummaryInformation(lDocumentSummaryInformation8tMsoDataStore'9`nU`nHIV1OHKY10UQQQ==2'9`nU`nItem  PropertiesUCompObj y   F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q