ŠĻą”±į>ž’ PRž’’’O’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’ģ„Į% šæŻ&bjbj%ē%ē ":GGŻ"’’’’’’lLLLLLLL`|||| ˆ`™<2ØØØØØØØØ<<<<<<<$Ė= ė?x><LØØØØØ><ŲLLØØS<ŲŲŲØrLØLØ<ŲØ<Ųv ŲN2ø7”LL <Øœ ąĶ·ī«Ä`|čL9. < i<0™<z9’c@Öc@ <Ų``LLLLŁŠÓ°É“«Ć½ Academic Senate Draft Minutes 9-27-04 Room 213 3-5 p.m. Present-, Curtis Corlew, Alex Sample, Ginny Buttermore, Mark Lewis, Brad Nash, Ed Lewis, Jeff Frates, Barbara Austin, Cindy McGrath, Michael Norris, Kirsten Martin, Shirley Baskin, Scott Cabral, Don Kaiper. Absent- Bill Fracisco, Andy Ochoa, Lois Yamakoshi. Guests-, Estelle Davi, Kiran Kamath, Dan Henry, Delores McNair, Charles Powell. Public Comment None. Agenda approved Item #5 is dropped Minutes approved Minutes from 9-13-04 not available yet. Announcements Still do not have the job specifications for a student assistant and secretary. Rock the vote: please announce in your classes to register to vote. One can register from the ŠÓ°É“«Ć½ web site. Norris- Meeting for Area B on October 15th. Norris will be able to attend. Neither Yamakoshi nor Norris will be able to attend the ASCCC meeting in Newport Beach on Oct 28th-30th. An email to get senators will be forthcoming formally asking one of them if they can represent us. Topics include the issue of what Math should be required for the AA degree requirement. Also how schools are put on the chancellor’s watch-list is on the agenda. Draft resolutions may not come out until after the Area B meeting. We still have the meeting on October 25th to discuss the math issue in the Senate. Nash-UF encouraging people to go to Martinez this Wednesday for a rally and the Board meeting. Need people from ŠÓ°É“«Ć½ to talk about the impact on faculty, classified staff and students. Kaiper-wants to create the “minute mustangs”, a group of faculty who are willing and able to rapidly respond to union issues. One of the union’s top priorities is the election of JoAnn Cookman. We need volunteers to help with phone banks on particular days. The phone messages are all scripted. Reports: 1. SGC-Frates and Austin How are we as a college going to address the budget issues as we go forth from here? Co-curricular funds have come back. Peter is trying to keep any money originated at the college, but is not hopeful. The District keeping the money only creates a one-year solution to a larger problem. It cannot solve anything. Historically we have saved carryover. Do we just wait to see what the District Office does with another year’s surplus? Now it is time to prepare for this years spending. One approach is to spend it all this year. Or do we start cutting now? We don’t want to overreact. Let 05-06 take care of itself. MLewis-Is there a discussion of personnel cuts? NO. Then spend every dime. Austin-Spending will position ourselves better for next year. We have “stability funding” for this year. Bringing in more students is the best approach. The midterm accreditation report will be posted. It must be approved by the Governing Board by year’s end. Any input would be needed in the next couple of months. We are going to try to celebrate employees, boost morale and recognize good works. 2. Kamath (See attached handout for more detail) There is a growing issue across the campus about approval of prerequisites. Should the C.C. give additional consideration in addition to that required by Title V? The C.C. decided to clearly separate the role of the CC, based on Title V from the implementation issues and other considerations. If there are implementation issues, the C.C. will note to include these issues in a separate implementation memo to the president. Examples would be effects on transfer, other programs, etc. These must be looked at using research, not anecdotal evidence. A course example would be Math 25 and 30. But the president will no longer sign off on prerequisites automatically. He will take into account other things. But the CC is just looking at the course outline. MLewis-the memo of concern should also go to the AS and SGC. Sample- Add a new category called provisional AS approval, where course or prerequisite would come back in a period of a few years. Prerequisites are revalidated every six years anyway. There is another new thing coming up. Should there be some courses flagged automatically for two readings at CC? For example, English, Math, problem courses, or those with prerequisites? Perhaps all courses should default to two readings unless the CC asks to see a course just once. Nash- List the criteria for two readings plus a catch-all. Sample- Have key questions on the approval request form. Make the deadline one month earlier for those that will need a second reading. Action Items/Discussion Items: Instructional Program Approval Process –Henry. Lewis passed out some suggestions for the draft process. Previously there was no process for approving new programs. We don’t have too many new ones any way. But there should be a way for the college to be able to do this. A draft of this process went to the C.C., the Academic Senate, and SGC. Already Dan has received some input for the draft from senators and CC members, including having the Senate have a more explicit part in the approval process. SGC also gives the Senate a voice through our three reps. Kamath has already given some input in terms of dates. SGC will look at overall college issues for adding the program. There are two phases to the process. The first phase picks out the most important part of the State Chancellor’s program approval process. For example, engineering and environmental science might have new programs in the future. Frates- What if the program is built one course at a time, one after another. We form a program piece meal without review. Look at an engineering program for example. There is still the worry that a department will say, look, we already have a program, in effect. The language needs to address this problem. There needs to be a trigger point. Henry- Courses put together one at a time are evaluated by the department using current course approval. When a series of courses wants official programs, the status then must appropriately go through the approved process. Give SGC some language or stipulation. Kamath-We need to better define what a new program means. Is it a change in emphasis? Just a change in requirements for a major, adding a major, or new options in a department program? We already have some programs approved but not in place. Austin- we don’t want the approval process so prescriptive that it is too difficult, nor any automatic approval process either. Who will do the approval? M.Lewis-C.C. is for individual course approval (COOR, prerequisites, transferability, etc.) The Academic Senate is for interdepartmental purview, a pattern of courses, enrollment trends, etc. SGC looks at the college as a whole, money, staff and student issues. Frates- C.C. should review phase one first. Kaiper- Just having 18 units isn’t enough to define a program. CC might be the first to recognize a program in development. Kamath- Local certificate approval still resides with the C.C. Decide on a case by case basis. Program might be recognized because of the assessment process. Norris- phase one really doesn’t need CC. Austin wants the CC expertise. MLewis Senate needs to look at the stuff. Henry- He needs a senate response as a whole, not individually, by the next senate meeting. Follow-up to Sept 20th budget meeting- Norris. Sample- will getting the carryover back bring the reserves down below 5%? Nash-This won’t have an effect. Austin- We can keep one or the other we are setting ourselves up for a 7 % paycut. Sample- He has the same concern. Does this endorse the 7% cut. Nash- They can’t make a good case anyway. Senate doesn’t hurt our case. Maybe we could put forth just a concern, rather than a formal resolution. Supposedly the District is looking at procedures. MLewis- We don’t want this held against us, change the language at bottom … and compensate for losses with management cuts. Norris- Does this cross into union lines? Austin- will my colleagues approve this? Glad a board member was there at the Monday meeting. Corlew- Take out the prophecy statement. Nash- This does not imply that we have accepted the District Office’s position on the budget. We can address the budget because they came to us to address the budget. MLewis- put in a “where as it is unclear an actual budget emergency exists”. Resolution: Moved by Kaiper, 2nd by Austin. We provisionally adopt the corrected draft resolution (see attachment) pending any negative response from senators after checking with constituents before noon Wed. (14-0-0). Possible next agenda items for October 11th: Program approval process, final reading Plagiarism code (issue of right to appeal before class is over) Human resources procedure for unlawful harassment (possible wording issues) Secretary and student assistant job description Senate web page issues and communication plan grade change policy CC self assessment IT discussion -V³|‚°¶&s€fhéėīša c l u Éź ‘ Œ$—$Ŗ$¬$i%’%”%–%½%¾%ż%ž%I&J&y&z&§&Ø&»&¼&Ī&Ļ&Ü&Ż&ųóóóóļóķķķķóęķļķóßóÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜCJ 5>*H*\ 5>*CJ\H*5\ 5>*\ 5>*CJ \2¬&9Ks‚Ņ> E l u Ž Ų{ĪźÉź{ g%h%żżūżłżūżżōōōōōżżļļļżźźżååż & F & F & F & FŻ&žh%i%–%¾%ž%J&z&Ø&¼&Ļ&Ż&żżųųųųųųųų & F  1h°Š/ °ą=!°h"°h#h$h%° i8@ń’8 NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH 6@6 Heading 1$@& 5>*\0@0 Heading 2$@&>*<A@ņ’”< Default Paragraph Font<C@ņ< Body Text Indent „8^„8Ż":’’’’¬&9Ks‚Ņ>EluŽŲ { Ī źÉź{g!h!i!–!¾!ž!J"z"Ø"¼"Ļ"ß"˜0€€˜0€€0€€˜0€0€˜0€0€€˜0€9˜0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜0€9˜0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜0€9˜ 0€9š 0€9˜0€9˜0€9˜0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€9˜ 0€€Ż&h%Ż&Ż&½ĆŲā sy¤­ĮÅĒĢĶÓ‘š;Kųżž|‚ō ś Ņ Ų ół w}ŌŚ`gfl’˜õū_ejp‰‰nt? E ” § ß"V|®°’? N 3 6?SXŽā\sšžYe”„¬°jęīņ”Ø"­"ß"333333333333333333yy­$$åź**()ĆÄšńHH ˆ‰õŒ – — Ó Ż ā ī +!L!ż!I"ß"’’Michael NorrisX\\lmcpitfs1\home$\mnorris\My Documents\Academic Senate\Minutes\Draft Minutes 9-27-04.docMichael NorrispC:\Documents and Settings\mnorris\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Draft Minutes 9-27-04.asdMichael NorrispC:\Documents and Settings\mnorris\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Draft Minutes 9-27-04.asdMichael NorrisX\\lmcpitfs1\home$\mnorris\My Documents\Academic Senate\Minutes\Draft Minutes 9-27-04.docMichael NorrispC:\Documents and Settings\mnorris\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Draft Minutes 9-27-04.asdMichael NorrispC:\Documents and Settings\mnorris\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Draft Minutes 9-27-04.asdMichael NorrispC:\Documents and Settings\mnorris\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Draft Minutes 9-27-04.asdMichael NorrispC:\Documents and Settings\mnorris\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Draft Minutes 9-27-04.asdMichael NorrispC:\Documents and Settings\mnorris\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Draft Minutes 9-27-04.asdMichael NorrisX\\lmcpitfs1\home$\mnorris\My Documents\Academic Senate\Minutes\Draft Minutes 9-27-04.doc ’’’”$šü™’’’’’’’’’ĢcĶrÉ O’’’’’’’’’ÓR®$ r‚6’’’’’’’’’é+…/r$øc’’’’’’’’’zzN3ŒŻlß’’’’’’’’’‹|;nŖź’’’’’’’’’56Ą=¹¾’’’’’’’’’.[A<Ö$'’’’’’’’’’:A­EĀ3’’’’’’’’’+Q½GŅĢö’’’’’’’’’¾P>Vģ¼£’’’’’’’’’¦- \„7Ąä’’’’’’’’’’OsaNRl ’’’’’’’’’ö@‰rŠÕÜ×’’’’’’’’’:t~8Ā’’’’’’’’’…CpxbN>ö’’’’’’’’’L/Sy‚ L’’’’’’’’’„h„˜žĘh^„h`„˜žo(.„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0żo(.„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0żo(.„”„˜žĘ”^„”`„˜žo(.€„d„˜žĘd^„d`„˜ž.‚„4„L’Ę4^„4`„L’.€„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.€„Ō „˜žĘŌ ^„Ō `„˜ž.‚„¤„L’ʤ^„¤`„L’.€„t„˜žĘt^„t`„˜ž.€„D„˜žĘD^„D`„˜ž.‚„„L’Ę^„`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žo(.„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žo(.€„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žo(.„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’. „8„˜žĘ8^„8`„˜žOJPJQJ^Jo(-€ „„˜žĘ^„`„˜žOJQJo(o€ „Ų „˜žĘŲ ^„Ų `„˜žOJQJo(§š€ „Ø „˜žĘØ ^„Ø `„˜žOJQJo(·š€ „x„˜žĘx^„x`„˜žOJQJo(o€ „H„˜žĘH^„H`„˜žOJQJo(§š€ „„˜žĘ^„`„˜žOJQJo(·š€ „č„˜žĘč^„č`„˜žOJQJo(o€ „ø„˜žĘø^„ø`„˜žOJQJo(§š„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žo(.€„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„8„0żĘ8^„8`„0żo(.€„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žo(.€„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žCJo(.„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜žOJPJQJ^Jo(·š„$ „˜žĘ$ ^„$ `„˜žo()€ „@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž‡hˆH.€ „„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž‡hˆH.‚ „ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’‡hˆH.€ „°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž‡hˆH.€ „€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž‡hˆH.‚ „P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’‡hˆH.„²„zžĘ²^„²`„zžo(.€„d„˜žĘd^„d`„˜ž.‚„4„L’Ę4^„4`„L’.€„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.€„Ō „˜žĘŌ ^„Ō `„˜ž.‚„¤„L’ʤ^„¤`„L’.€„t„˜žĘt^„t`„˜ž.€„D„˜žĘD^„D`„˜ž.‚„„L’Ę^„`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žo(.€„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„Ś„zžĘŚ^„Ś`„zžo(.€„Œ „˜žĘŒ ^„Œ `„˜ž.‚„\ „L’Ę\ ^„\ `„L’.€„,„˜žĘ,^„,`„˜ž.€„ü„˜žĘü^„ü`„˜ž.‚„Ģ„L’ĘĢ^„Ģ`„L’.€„œ„˜žĘœ^„œ`„˜ž.€„l„˜žĘl^„l`„˜ž.‚„<„L’Ę<^„<`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žo(.„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜žo(.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜ž.„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜žo(.h„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜ž.€„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.‚„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.€„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.€„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.‚„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.€„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.€„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.‚„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.h„Š„˜žĘŠ^„Š`„˜ž.h„ „˜žĘ ^„ `„˜ž.’h„p„L’Ęp^„p`„L’.h„@ „˜žĘ@ ^„@ `„˜ž.h„„˜žĘ^„`„˜ž.’h„ą„L’Ęą^„ą`„L’.h„°„˜žĘ°^„°`„˜ž.h„€„˜žĘ€^„€`„˜ž.’h„P„L’ĘP^„P`„L’.L/SyÓR®$ö@‰r…Cpx:A­EzzN3+Q½G¦- \”$š.[Aé+…/¾P>V:t56Ą=ĢcĶ’Osa‹|;’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’Ęä°                                   r‚Nū                 øčQ                 “Ģ–ĖŖčŽœČf      æĪ®                 (l_         `čÜ                                           ß"’@€‰‰ÄIs‰ˆŻ"€@’’Unknown’’’’’’’’’’’’G‡z €’Times New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡z €’Arial?5 ‡z €’Courier New;€Wingdings"1ˆšŠh,"Š&“3Šf„3Šfœ æ=\šhh““0dM#ˆ 2ƒQš’’Draft minutes 10-13-03LMCMichael Norrisž’ą…ŸņłOh«‘+'³Ł0˜ ĄĢŲäš $ @ L X dpx€ˆäDraft minutes 10-13-03rafŠÓ°É“«Ć½MCMCNormaliMichael Norris017hMicrosoft Word 9.0-@Øč!@ꇜģ«Ä@ąp÷(ŖÄ@ł“ī«Ä æž’ÕĶ՜.“—+,ł®0 hpŒ”œ¤ ¬“¼Ä Ģ ļäŠÓ°É“«Ć½=M# Draft minutes 10-13-03 Title ž’’’ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>ž’’’@ABCDEFž’’’HIJKLMNž’’’ż’’’Qž’’’ž’’’ž’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’Root Entry’’’’’’’’ ĄFŠ·ī«ÄS€1Table’’’’’’’’’’’’c@WordDocument’’’’’’’’":SummaryInformation(’’’’?DocumentSummaryInformation8’’’’’’’’’’’’GCompObj’’’’jObjectPool’’’’’’’’’’’’Š·ī«ÄŠ·ī«Ä’’’’’’’’’’’’ž’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’ž’ ’’’’ ĄFMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8ō9²q